The Listener must receive a TRM as the first data from the TI run-time environment. The TRM tells the Listener which TP to invoke and the characteristics of that program. After sending the TRM, the TI run-time environment must wait for a response before sending data.
Advantages Disadvantages Concurrent Development Model Software Engineering 6,7/10 245 reviews Process models. 1. 1 Process Models Chapter 3. 2 A software life cycle is the series of identifiable stages that a software product undergoes during its lifetime.
- Apr 15, 2015 4. Rapid Application Development (RAD) Rapid Application Development (RAD) is an effective methodology to provide much quicker development and higher-quality results than those achieved with the other software development methodologies. It is designed in such a way that, it easily take the maximum advantages of the software development.
- What is Concurrent Development model?, RDBMS tutorials, DBMS Tutorials. Computer Organization Tutorials, Computer Architecture Tutorials, PHP, PHP Coding, JavaScript Development, CSS style Sheets, HTML, Web Development, Web. RDBMS Computer Architecture Software Engineering. Web Development. Intro To Web-Tech PHP JavaScript HTML CSS.
Some days ago I was in testing conference in Tel-Aviv. The subject of a conference was “QA& Development in Agile”. Despite the fact that the main subject in the conference was the Agile method in the development process these days, during all lectures the presenters compared the Agile method to traditional methods, especially to the V-Model. Therefore, I decided to write and to compare between the most familiar life cycle models in development and testing process. In order to achieve a structured and controllable software development effort, several software development models are being used. There are many accepted models in development process, for example, the Spiral Model, the Waterfall-model, the V-Model and the Agile Model, which are popular today. All this models define a systematic way to accomplish an orderly way of working during the project.
Testing appears in each of these life cycle models, but with very different meanings and different extend. Some methods work better for specific type of projects, but in the final result, the most important factor for the project success may be how closely particular plan was followed. According to my experience, in some projects we can see some models work in parallel; the reason is a very dynamic project aids. For example: a project chooses the Spiral Model in advanced, but during the developing process, it becomes clear that the project should update some of its requirements because of customer change of design.
In this example we can see that Spiral Model has interaction with some indications of Agile Model. In this post I’ll try to describe differences of most well-known life cycle models and to answer to question: what strengths and weakness each of them. Waterfall-Model The original SDLC model was the Waterfall-model. This model is very simple to understand and very well known in development process.
A great and terrible beauty pdf free. The main concept of this model is that only when one development level is completed will the next one be initiated. At the end of each phase, a review takes place to determine if the project is on the right path and whether or not to continue or discard the project. Advantages – The Waterfall method is also well known amongst the software developers therefore it is easy to use – Works well for smaller projects where requirements are very well understood – Cost effectiveness: Time spent early in the software production cycle can lead to greater economy at later stages Disadvantages – The crucial disadvantage of this model is that testing is understood as a “one time” action at the end of the project just before the release the operation. The test is seen as a “final inspection”, an analogy to a manufacturing inspection before handling over the product to the customer.
– High amounts of risk and uncertainty – Inflexible – Poor model for complex and object-oriented projects In summary, the Waterfall Model should use in projects with clearly and deeply understood of project requirements, design, technical tools and infrastructures. V-Model The second model is V-model.
This is the most familiar model in development process. The model has the form of a “V”. The main idea in the V-Model is that development tasks and testing tasks are corresponding activities of equal importance, which is symbolized by the two sides of the “V”. The development process proceeds from the upper left point of the V toward the right, ending at the upper right point. In the left-hand, downward-sloping branch of the V, development personnel define business requirements, application design parameters and design processes. At the base point of the V, the code is written. In the right-hand, upward-sloping branch of the V, testing and debugging is done.
The unit testing is carried out first, followed by bottom-up integration testing. The extreme upper right point of the V represents product release and ongoing support. Like in Waterfall-Model each phase must be completed before the next phase begins, V-model actually is a modified version of a Waterfall-Model. The V-model ordains that the code testing documentation is written in tandem with the development phases that means, for instance, the integration tests should be documented as and when the high level design is finalized and the unit tests should be ready as and when the detailed specifications are laid down. In this model testers should be involved in reviewing development information as soon as possible. Like Waterfall-Model testing process and fixing faults can be done in any stage in the life cycle, but the cost of finding and fixing faults increases dramatically as development progresses. The number and intensity of the test levels may be modified according to the specific needs of the project and for every development stage there is a corresponding test level.
Advantages – Due to the fact that in the V-Model defects are being repair short time after they have been detected, it is cheaper to fix them – The model has a reputation of a very good base for the partitioning of testing; all the participants in development of a system have a responsibility for quality assurance and testing. – Testing activities like requirements, test designing happens well before coding.
This fact saves a lot of time and also helps in developing a very good understanding of the project at the initial stage. – The objectives of testing are changing, and specific for each test level Disadvantages – The V-Model is very rigid and the least flexible, it means that if one of the requirements are changing, the tester should update the test documentation as a whole – This model applicable mostly to big companies because the model needs lot of resources – The amount and the intensity of the test levels should be tailored according to the specific needs of the project In summary: In the V-Model the place of testing in development process is critical.
The fault finding occurs in early stage of the development process which provides the cheaper alternative for fixing it. Spiral model The spiral model is mostly used in large projects. For smaller projects, Agile concept is more appropriate. This model of development combines the features of the prototyping model and the waterfall model. The spiral model was defined by Barry Boehm in his article “A Spiral Model of Software Development and Enhancement” (1985).
This model was not the first model to discuss iterative development, but it was the first model to explain why the iteration matters. Spiral model is an evolutionary version of incremental prototyping. Incremental development means that the project is not done by (possibly large) pieces, but as a series of smaller developments and deliveries. Incremental models try to reduce the risk of developing the wrong system by delivering useful parts of the system early and getting customer feedback. System functionality and reliability requirements will grow over the time, from an early version only for the development or for users, to version released to final customers later.
What about testing in spiral model? In spiral model testing must be adapted to such development models, and continuous integration testing and regression testing are necessary. The tests should be a reusable test cases for every component and increment, and it should be reused and updated for every additional increment. If this is not a case, the software reliability tends to decrease over time instead of increasing. Advantages – Spiral Life Cycle Model is a very flexible model. Development phases can be determined by the project manager, according to the complexity of the project. – Estimates (i.e.
Budget, schedule, etc.) get more realistic as work progresses, because important issues are discovered earlier. – Good for large and mission-critical projects. – Software is produced early in the software life cycle. Disadvantages – Doesn’t work well for smaller projects. – Evaluating the risks involved in the project can shoot up the cost and it may be higher than the cost for building the system.
– Spiral model is much customized for every project. – Risk analysis requires highly specific expertise. In summary: It serves as the best option for businesses with volatile business goals but where there is a need for a prototype to handle the complexities in the business procedures. Agile Model Agile software development is a conceptual framework for software engineering that promotes development iterations throughout the life-cycle of the project. Agile as the name refers implies something to do very quickly. Hence, Agile Testing refers to validate the client requirements as soon as possible and make it customer friendly. Agile practices are specially tailored to eliminate all kinds of waste manifesting in a product life cycle, but more especially, improving the quality of developed product is a major goal threaded into most of those practice.
There are many agile development methods; most minimize risk by developing software in short amounts of time. Software developed during one unit of time is referred to as an iteration, which may last from one to four weeks. Each iteration is an entire software project: including planning, requirements analysis, design, coding, testing, and documentation. In Agile testing as soon as the build is out, testing is expected to get started and report the bugs quickly if any found. There are some accepted properties to Agile Model, for example: -Short release cycles- agile development can’t be called agile unless it is done in short repetitive iterations.Customer involvement. Tester should to provide his thoughts on the client requirements rather than just being the audience at the other end.
Concurrent Engineering Benefits
– Responding to change – agile development is focused on quick responses to change and continuous development. – Individuals and interactions over processes and tools Advantages – Saving of time and money. – Focus more on the application rather than documenting things. – Daily meetings and discussions for the project following Agile model can help to determine the issues well in advance and work on it accordingly. – Requirements changing even in late stage of development – The end result is the high quality software in least possible time duration and satisfied customer. Disadvantages – The project can easily get taken off track if the customer representative is not clear what final outcome that they want.
Computer Engineering Advantages
– There is lack of emphasis on necessary designing and documentation. – User involvement is often a potential problem especially in big and complex projects – Agile processes are really only applicable for products where reliability is not very critical. (According to my experience, the real-time projects in defense and medical software development are used more traditional life cycle models as V-Model or Spiral Model) In summary: After all strengths and weaknesses I have come to the conclusion that with the quicker development, testing and constant feedback from the user, the Agile methodology becomes the appropriate approach for the projects to be delivered in a short span of time. Agile methods also emphasize working software as the primary measure of progress. Combined with the preference for face-to-face communication, agile methods produce very little written documentation relative to other methods.